probably missing something slightly obvious

but if I want to generate something like this [:select [:option "one"] [:option "two"]]

where the two options are generated by a for loop

how can I actually do it?

I can do easily something like

(mapv (fn [v] [:option v]) [1 2 3])
[[:option 1] [:option 2] [:option 3]]

but then can't find the right magic to compose the two things

argh yes sorry I managed (vec (cons :select (mapv (fn [v] [:option v]) [1 2 3])))

I doubt it's the best way though

(into [:select] (map (fn [v] [:option v]) ..))

ah great thanks always forget about into

a proposed law: if you're looking for a coll processing fn for more than 5 min, reduce or into is probably what you're looking for

sounds reasonable 🙂

from all the other programming languages I've seen into is a bit of an outsider

that's also why I always forget it

into is a wonderfully odd fn 🙂

think of it as a short cut: (into init xs) = (reduce conj init xs)

(looking at the source...) that's actually how it's implemented!

ah thanks nice

is there an easy way to just dump the app-state while debugging in clojurescript?

should it be available in the browser console?

(js/console.log (pr-str state))

if you're using reagent, data-frisk is amazing (you can probably use it if you don't)

I'm using reagent yes

ok cool I'll have a look thanks

🙂

omg; pause on exception --> jumps to cljs line --> is amazing

:-)

hey all, quick quick about how recursion vs trampoline works in cljs. building up collections via recursion that can become somewhat large (mid single digit million maps of 5-10 k/v pairs). right now I’m doing the collection buildup through a simple loop/recur, but I’m noticing serious performance degradations when I get into a collection with a few million members. I don’t know if that’s normal behavior or not. maybe I just shouldn’t be playing with collections that large. I wonder, though, if using trampoline instead of loop/recur would be more efficient. having trouble finding info about the performance characteristics of one v another, would love any insight that people can provide on that

code?

@mss first step would be to use transients

but millions of things in JS will start to degrade since the GC will kick in

but no trampoline would not be more efficient

greetings fellow clojurians

how can I approach displaying some google calendar events on a page with cljs?

or maybe there is another service more suitable for this?

how does one :cljs/quit a nodejs repl via piggyback so that the node process is destroyed as well? When I restart piggyback few time I start collecting zombie node processes.

what is the main disadvantage of dirac (besides setting it up)? I just got dirac working, and I can'r belineve I've been doing cljs for 6 months without dirac

when you develop a serious addiction on it and I stop updating it to work with new chrome releases, you will scream in pain, so be careful! 😉

@darwin: lol, all this time I had no idea you were active dev behind dirac; if I were you, I'd create a kickstarter every time chrome has a new release -- and only update dirac when the ransom is paid

^-- /sarcasm

hehe, adding it to my long list of ideas 🙂

the one thing that could make it better -- is that the "source *.cljs view" in dirac is wasted; id'bne nice if it could somehow comunicate with the emacs 25 running on my system -- so it jumps me into the right line in eamcs and I just edit it in emacs

such integration would be nice, but not on my list at the moment

maybe we should move to #dirac, ok?