This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2023-01-10
Channels
- # babashka (17)
- # beginners (57)
- # calva (19)
- # cider (1)
- # clj-kondo (21)
- # clojure (36)
- # clojure-austin (15)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-china (1)
- # clojure-europe (35)
- # clojure-filipino (1)
- # clojure-hk (1)
- # clojure-indonesia (1)
- # clojure-japan (1)
- # clojure-korea (2)
- # clojure-my (1)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-norway (5)
- # clojure-sg (1)
- # clojure-spec (6)
- # clojure-taiwan (1)
- # clojure-uk (3)
- # clojurescript (7)
- # clr (9)
- # community-development (5)
- # cursive (14)
- # datalevin (1)
- # emacs (5)
- # events (5)
- # exercism (2)
- # figwheel-main (2)
- # fulcro (6)
- # funcool (3)
- # introduce-yourself (2)
- # joyride (7)
- # leiningen (4)
- # london-clojurians (9)
- # malli (3)
- # membrane (1)
- # missionary (54)
- # music (1)
- # nbb (2)
- # pathom (5)
- # pedestal (55)
- # rdf (13)
- # re-frame (10)
- # reitit (3)
- # shadow-cljs (17)
- # vim (58)
- # web-security (12)
In the (presumably unlikely) case where test/check
does not find any failures in a function I've spec'ed, what is the expected output? e.g., I have a function foo
and I check it like so
(->> (test/check 'foo) test/summarize-results)
In my case I'm just getting back a map of {:total 0}
which seems suspect to me given the docs for these functions.maybe `foo instead of 'foo ?
(that is, a resolved symbol name)
I suspect it's not finding foo and thus not testing anything, see the guide too https://clojure.org/guides/spec#_testing
oh, right. I forgot about that syntax and thought the ` was just an italicized '
Thanks!