This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-12-14
Channels
- # adventofcode (36)
- # announcements (5)
- # atom-editor (2)
- # babashka (19)
- # beginners (98)
- # biff (7)
- # calva (25)
- # cider (1)
- # cljdoc (10)
- # clojure (70)
- # clojure-czech (1)
- # clojure-dev (14)
- # clojure-europe (79)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-norway (8)
- # clojure-seattle (3)
- # clojure-uk (2)
- # clojurescript (28)
- # community-development (44)
- # core-typed (3)
- # cursive (2)
- # datalevin (5)
- # datascript (5)
- # datomic (1)
- # dev-tooling (12)
- # emacs (14)
- # honeysql (3)
- # humbleui (11)
- # introduce-yourself (1)
- # java (1)
- # kaocha (1)
- # lsp (3)
- # malli (21)
- # matcher-combinators (2)
- # nbb (7)
- # off-topic (15)
- # portal (12)
- # reitit (4)
- # releases (1)
- # shadow-cljs (59)
- # sql (8)
- # tree-sitter (3)
Good morning 🙂 We had another sprinkle of snow tonight, lovely.
Morning! We had a light sprinkle of rain at -2°C tonight, continuing into the morning. Happy to have survived the walk with our dog 😅
Currently trying to convince my colleagues that, yes, it is possible to license newer versions of your software differently. They are convinced that it can’t be done if the new license contradicts the old one, while I’m trying to tell them that it doesn’t matter when you are the one who owns the copyright…
There must be some law text supporting your claim
The main issue is convincing them that this Jørgen guy probably isn’t the expert he purports to be after they’ve spent a decade believing so.
presumably they are getting confused by the difference between "retrospectively changing the license on already out-there releases" and "changing the license for future releases" ?
Exactly. Maybe I should email them a link to the official documentation about Clojure’s approach to identity and state :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
with the first being expressly forbidden by some (i looked at MIT, and it's forbidden there) oss licenses, and the second being absolutely fine
I’ve already sent them several emails explaining that actually we aren’t modifying the licence, just relicensing for new users
To them the software is exactly one entity, not several releases with separate licences. It’s very hard to get through to them about this.
ah, you need an IAAL person to override their IANAL issues
I have had to think about software licences since I was a teenager. I wish they would just trust me on this.
or alternatively, find someone called jørgen to offer up a revised opinion ? if they can't tell the difference between software versions, they might not be able to tell the difference between jørgens!
good point @U052XLL3A 😄
i don't think ChatGPT gave you a useful answer there @U4P4NREBY 😢
it doesn't talk about newer versions being allowed to have different license options from prior versions
@U0524B4UW Perhaps this is better
bingo: now it's hitting the 💅 right on the 👦 !
To be fair, the first prompt was also a bit biased. BTW I actually just sent them the second skærmbillede 😛
yep, agree - the first prompt was ambiguous and it responded well to one interpretation of the prompt
you must really be on tenterhooks waiting to find out whether they will believe chatGPT when they wouldn't believe you!
You could point out that some software is published under dual licenses, such as an open source and an incompatible commercial one. So I would argue you could even license old versions under a different license in addition to the old one. For new releases you could then use just the new one.
But noooo noooo, someone called Jørgen apparently once told them that it can’t be done…!
no worries.... that is what we are here for. To help and support each other with rants so that we all can keep a tiny bit of our sanity. :hugging_face:
it's less æsthetically placed
i'm on a vanilla UK macbook keyboard - i have alt-o=ø, alt-a=å and alt-'=æ by default ... there are others, but i don't use them, so i don't know them
Nothing special: http://allswellworld.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/biggest_keyboard2b2.jpg
I always thought that the funny-looking o, a etc are just accents, but they are actually their own letters.
@U0524B4UW wait, why do you use Scandinavian letters? Are you secretly Scandinavian?
@U4P4NREBY i'm british, but lived in norway for a bit... my oldest son and my ex still do... i have a norsk personnummer, although i don't know what it is... so i have no idea what that makes me
ha, my norsk is pretty rusty these days, so i'll be a poor-quality fake, bought in the pub on a drunken night out
morninggggg… hitting new low temperature over here (I think) (nothing compared to what’s in Europe though)
so you already escaped once @U0525KG62? or are you now a different @U0525KG62, dispatched to lure more victims ?
oh, no big reason, maybe just wondering whether to go into hiding...
/me rushes to fridge to throw away last night's calamari
nothing to see here ... 🙈