This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-11-16
Channels
- # announcements (7)
- # babashka (8)
- # beginners (48)
- # calva (4)
- # cider (6)
- # circleci (2)
- # clj-commons (14)
- # clj-kondo (3)
- # clj-on-windows (7)
- # cljs-dev (34)
- # clojure (49)
- # clojure-dev (25)
- # clojure-europe (48)
- # clojure-losangeles (1)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-norway (33)
- # clojure-uk (2)
- # clojurescript (37)
- # community-development (5)
- # conjure (17)
- # cursive (2)
- # data-science (1)
- # editors (10)
- # emacs (50)
- # events (22)
- # honeysql (11)
- # introduce-yourself (1)
- # jobs-discuss (13)
- # lsp (42)
- # malli (9)
- # off-topic (7)
- # pathom (11)
- # portal (5)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reagent (22)
- # reitit (8)
- # reveal (1)
- # rewrite-clj (4)
- # shadow-cljs (38)
- # xtdb (21)
I've been playing around with tracing, and wondering about the difference between C-c M-t v tracing and invoking the debugger, exiting with trace, which seems to show a more detailed trace
for example, with regular trace, it looks like,
TRACE t9036: (rich4clojure.easy.problem-090/__ #{1 3 2} #{4 5})
TRACE t9036: => #{[2 5] [3 4] [1 4] [1 5] [2 4] [3 5]}
comparing that to https://docs.cider.mx/cider/_images/tracing.png it seems less detailed?