This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-08-19
Channels
- # admin-announcements (2)
- # beginners (25)
- # boot (93)
- # cider (2)
- # clara (2)
- # cljs-dev (63)
- # cljsjs (3)
- # cljsrn (38)
- # clojure (142)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-brasil (2)
- # clojure-czech (1)
- # clojure-dev (7)
- # clojure-greece (1)
- # clojure-russia (170)
- # clojure-spec (11)
- # clojure-uk (65)
- # clojurescript (46)
- # clojurex (1)
- # code-reviews (3)
- # cursive (11)
- # datomic (35)
- # euroclojure (6)
- # events (2)
- # flambo (2)
- # hoplon (115)
- # instaparse (11)
- # jobs (21)
- # jobs-rus (3)
- # lambdaisland (2)
- # off-topic (17)
- # om (35)
- # onyx (161)
- # planck (1)
- # protorepl (7)
- # random (1)
- # re-frame (31)
- # reagent (19)
- # ring-swagger (21)
- # rum (5)
- # spacemacs (3)
- # specter (25)
- # test-check (20)
- # testing (7)
- # untangled (2)
- # yada (50)
Hello, I'm kinda new to the world of clojure and am from the JS webpack world, is there such solution for server side today? I work with figwheel all right for my client side but am having a hard time knowing how to make changes in my server code without stopping and starting the server to load the new data
@vinnyataide if you’re using ring (or something that runs on top of it) you can use https://github.com/weavejester/lein-ring to run a development server
@jm I'm trying but am closing with yada, thanks for it
@vinnyataide Haven’t had the chance to play with yada, but it looks like it used ring to me (through bidi), might be worth a try
@jm yeah it uses bidi, but it uses aleph as the server, not ring I think
well I see that ring and aleph can be used side by side, IDK really lol
@vinnyataide: try asking in #yada, it's a pretty active and helpful channel
thanks shaun will do that
I used the golang Tick channel to rate limit calls to an external api, i.e. call could only proceed when the channle was readable. Is there a better way to do this in clojure ?
is it idiomatic to perform functions with side-effects (http or db) in (let [..])
block ? does the body would be executed as soon as the async operation would have been completed?
aha, thanks
what would the benefit of nested let blocks be? I think that let becomes let* after macroexpansion, which if is like scheme, is nested let's
none, if that’s all that’s involved. I think the final bytecode is probably about the same.