This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-06-19
Channels
- # aws-lambda (1)
- # bangalore-clj (4)
- # beginners (66)
- # boot (13)
- # cider (9)
- # cljs-dev (44)
- # cljsjs (3)
- # clojure (181)
- # clojure-austin (2)
- # clojure-greece (6)
- # clojure-italy (2)
- # clojure-russia (64)
- # clojure-sg (1)
- # clojure-spec (68)
- # clojure-uk (60)
- # clojurescript (66)
- # conf-proposals (12)
- # cryogen (1)
- # cursive (3)
- # datomic (44)
- # graphql (1)
- # hoplon (2)
- # jobs (2)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # keechma (2)
- # liberator (6)
- # luminus (2)
- # nyc (1)
- # off-topic (92)
- # om (10)
- # onyx (17)
- # parinfer (39)
- # pedestal (8)
- # proton (11)
- # re-frame (110)
- # reagent (2)
- # remote-jobs (11)
- # ring-swagger (9)
- # rum (2)
- # sql (2)
- # test-check (6)
- # untangled (138)
@hackeryarn Can you show a minimal example of what you did?
Just released Muuntaja (0.3.0 and) 0.3.1 with a bunch of breaking changes https://github.com/metosin/muuntaja/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#030-1962017
@abarylko sorry for the late response, here is an example of what I'm trying to do. https://pastebin.com/pY7dEswi
It does work if it's under the same api definition.
only the first routes read the inputstream. See https://github.com/weavejester/compojure/wiki/Common-Problems
@hackeryarn See a possible solution in https://gist.github.com/ikitommi/1067209e997fd8f847f0dfcf32d07b20
Ah thank you. That's a really good approach. Can I wrap the individually definitely apis with their own middleware even if they already have a middleware around them?
correct
Awesome! That's exactly what I was looking for. Thank you, for the clean solution.