This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-06-02
Channels
- # aleph (5)
- # beginners (112)
- # boot (137)
- # cider (10)
- # cljs-dev (36)
- # cljsrn (2)
- # clojure (118)
- # clojure-argentina (1)
- # clojure-berlin (1)
- # clojure-brasil (3)
- # clojure-dev (4)
- # clojure-italy (2)
- # clojure-nl (13)
- # clojure-russia (23)
- # clojure-spec (5)
- # clojure-uk (53)
- # clojurescript (344)
- # clojutre (1)
- # core-async (65)
- # cursive (9)
- # datascript (7)
- # datomic (28)
- # devops (1)
- # emacs (16)
- # events (1)
- # jobs (5)
- # keechma (18)
- # lumo (56)
- # off-topic (7)
- # om (3)
- # onyx (14)
- # protorepl (21)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reagent (20)
- # ring (12)
- # ring-swagger (9)
- # specter (17)
- # unrepl (14)
- # vim (14)
- # yada (22)
yeah, but it would only be right 1/n! of the time, and given how often spec.test tests before quitting, this probably works for vectors of length up to 5
You could probably use spec to converge on some behavior, in a genetic algorithm sort of way. See http://gigasquidsoftware.com/blog/2016/07/18/genetic-programming-with-clojure-dot-spec/
You probably wouldn't want all the genetic algorithm stuff. Just divide and conquer over the sort space. But you could probably look at some of her code for generating data.
They can literally read your mind now: http://neurosciencenews.com/fmri-imagination-6814/
That's awesome
On the Unhappiness of Software Developers - https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04993