Good point, I think most of features work with cljs (maybe clean-ns not that much)

But agree it's a good idea add a comment about that somewhere

> (maybe clean-ns not that much) oh interesting, I figured both targets would be on par (since a static approach is followed, so JVM clj doesn't enjoy any 'privilege'?)

yeah, I don't code clojurescript usually, so it'd need to test but I think those cljs requires that require js directly could not work fine with clean-ns

otherwise, I think everything else works

cljs is an interesting topic, could be easily a killer/distinctive feature for the project (I'd happily contribute but always have quite a lot on my OSS plate :/)

I mean if cljs was tested/CI'd it would feel a little more dependable for that use case

No problem, if you could provide an issue that'd be a great start 🙂 Then I can work on that when have the time

yes agree, there are tests for cljs/cljc files already, if you find anything else that cljs is quite different we can add more tests/fix it

as for clj-kondo: cljs is an explicit goal, if something isn't working correctly there I consider it as a bug

so from an analysis data perspective, I think you should be good