This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-04-08
Channels
- # bangalore-clj (4)
- # beginners (160)
- # calva (132)
- # cider (18)
- # clara (1)
- # cljsrn (2)
- # clojure (129)
- # clojure-boston (1)
- # clojure-europe (5)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-losangeles (1)
- # clojure-nl (33)
- # clojure-uk (49)
- # clojurescript (88)
- # cursive (20)
- # datomic (5)
- # duct (3)
- # fulcro (33)
- # graphql (7)
- # jobs (3)
- # kaocha (3)
- # nrepl (41)
- # off-topic (58)
- # pathom (18)
- # re-frame (1)
- # reagent (5)
- # shadow-cljs (148)
- # spacemacs (7)
- # tools-deps (7)
Has anyone here successfully downgraded from a datomic cloud production topology back to a solo topology? I tried this weekend and it never finished. Ultimately I just rolled the update back and am now stuck with a production topology.
i noticed, in transaction functions sometimes data structures are vanilla clojure, like a vector, but then sometimes they are something like a java.util.ArrayList, is there any pattern to this?
i had a call to vector?
in my transactor function that starting failing sporadically, is vector and java.util.ArrayList the only two? or can there be other types too?
@currentoor Datomic doesn’t make any guarantees about Java/Clojure type preservation across the wire
@marshall, that sounds fine but i just need to know all the things that a vector, from the peer, can be converted to? is java.util.ArrayList it? or can it be other types as well?