@cfleming: type hints on the argvec have been fixed indeed

var type hints aren't really deprecated, type hinting the argvec has been the preferrable way of type hinting for a while

@alexmiller: any reason I'm missing why vectors are Comparable but sequences aren't or is it just an oversight?

thought I could write (sort-by (juxt val key) the-map) as (sort-by rseq the-map) or (sort-by reverse the-map) but apparently not

There's a ticket out there re making lists comparable

ah. cool

just lists or all seqs?

I guess sequences would be similar

I'm not sure though if there is some reason why they aren't already

I'd expect any IPC should be Comparable (maybe sorted colls would be weird though?)

The vector behavior is specifically doc'ed on the data structures ref page so it seems like it was a conscious choice

But can't say I know why

ok, thanks. I'll leave a comment on CLJ-1467

@alexmiller: @bronsa maybe they're not comparable because of lazyness? Aka, compare would force to evaluate the whole sequence. Not saying they should not be, but that could point why they aren't yet

it wouldn't necessarily have to evaluate the whole sequence, just enough elements to find a difference

obviously comparing two identical infinite sequences wouldn't terminate, but I'd say that would be expected behaviour