test-check 2017-06-27

@gfredericks ah. I see what you're saying. Thanks! Given that, I think I need to re-think what I was trying to do. If I'm unable to figure it out I'll post back in here.

👍 1

I'm thinking of creating prop/for-all2, or prop/for-all-2, whichever name is better

differences: - doesn't have the TCHECK-131 interpretation of returned exceptions - uses sequential bindings like gen/let, and has the map-binding syntax of gen/let as well for parallel bindings - any other improvements anybody would want?