Clojurians Log v2

Embarrassingly, I see a few functions that I created that don't have any test coverage! 😞 I'll fix that!

A quick patch to get it working is

diff --git a/lib/deps.edn b/lib/deps.edn
index 569ef77c..0e9e5096 100644
--- a/lib/deps.edn
+++ b/lib/deps.edn
@@ -34,6 +34,15 @@
                   :jvm-opts ["-XX:-OmitStackTraceInFastThrow"]
                   :extra-paths ["test"]
                   :main-opts ["-m" "kaocha.runner"]}
+           :clofidence {:classpath-overrides {org.clojure/clojure nil}
+                        :extra-deps {com.github.flow-storm/clojure {:mvn/version "1.12.5"}
+                                      com.github.flow-storm/clofidence {:mvn/version "LATEST"}}
+                        :exec-fn clofidence.main/run
+                        :exec-args {:report-name "Hansel"
+                                    :test-fn kaocha.runner/-main*
+                                    :test-fn-args []}
+                        :jvm-opts ["-Dclojure.storm.instrumentOnlyPrefixes=hansel"
+                                   "-Dclojure.storm.instrumentSkipRegex=.*test.*"]}
            :cognitest {:extra-paths ["test"]
                        :extra-deps {clojure-lsp/test-helper {:local/root "../test-helper"}
                                     io.github.cognitect-labs/test-runner
diff --git a/scripts/make.clj b/scripts/make.clj
index fd803036..0bf74d45 100644
--- a/scripts/make.clj
+++ b/scripts/make.clj
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@

 (defn ^:private unit-test [dir]
   (println :running-unit-tests... dir)
-  (clj! dir ["-M:test"])
+  (clj! dir ["-X:test:clofidence"])
   (println))

 (defn ^:private mv-here [file]

clofidence isn't static analysis I think though

oh you mean, not to build it into clojure-lsp for code analysis, but to run it on clojure-lsp

Yeah. Sorry, I tried to word it less confusingly, but failed 😞

s/with/on/

yeah that looks pretty useful!

there's also cloverage btw

I checked out cloverage too. It works more like code coverage tools that I've used with Java projects, but there were issues

Minor issues, granted, but it seemed like it didn't always get all the branching correct

ah ok