hugsql 2017-12-30

So, yes, it seems like they are coming back as strings from jdbc/query

this seems a might odd to me

Thanks @admay & @jmayaalv. There was something else going wrong and not the queries 🙂

@sandbags if you want a way around it you can probably do something as follows:

(extend-protocol jdbc/IResultSetReadColumn
  ;; all SQL timestamp cols returned as Java longs
  Timestamp
  (result-set-read-column [ts _ _]
    (.getTime ^Timestamp ts))

  ;; all SQL date cols returned as longs
  Date
  (result-set-read-column [ts _ _]
    (.getTime ^Date ts)))

This will convert your date/timestamp fields into long (Or whatever you want them to be)

I am sure I am doing something daft but… I am using sqlite in development and finding that Hugsql appears to be returning timestamp column values as strings rather than date objects of some kind. A quick google hasn't rustled anything up.

Anyone know what I might obviously have missed here?

@sandbags have you tried using jdbc/query directly to see if strings are also returned? It’s usually the JDBC driver that does the marshalling/unmarshalling