This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-08-05
Channels
- # architecture (23)
- # bangalore-clj (2)
- # beginners (93)
- # cider (27)
- # cljsjs (2)
- # clojure (66)
- # clojure-russia (9)
- # clojure-spec (28)
- # clojure-uk (3)
- # clojurescript (47)
- # cursive (2)
- # data-science (2)
- # datomic (10)
- # editors (9)
- # emacs (4)
- # figwheel (3)
- # figwheel-main (1)
- # hyperfiddle (2)
- # jobs (1)
- # nrepl (59)
- # off-topic (2)
- # onyx (10)
- # pedestal (1)
- # re-frame (13)
- # reagent (9)
- # reitit (17)
- # shadow-cljs (8)
- # tools-deps (4)
- # vim (2)
I'm finding pull syntax dramatically slower (4x) than binding all the return values i want with where clauses. Any ideas why that might happen?
Anyone experienced this error?
No implementation of method: :value-size of protocol: #'datomic.cloud.tx-limits/ValueSize found for class: java.lang.Integer
It only happens in cloud during a specific transaction. I cannot reproduce this localy š
I ran into this exact thing and it cost me a day of confusion not understanding what I was doing wrong. I think maybe we should aggregate these into a Common Error Messages FAQ?
I realize now that the previous statement can sound a bit rude. I ment it should be easy to work around on my end, not that it should be an easy bug for you to fix on your end š
Hello all, Hopefully simple question about Datomic Cloud.
If Iām understanding the Datomic Cloud documentation on pricing correctly, you can run Datomic Solo Topology for $1/day, but if you want to scale (for either performance/capacity or HA) the next step would be to switch to Datomic Production Topology which would start at about $15/day (two i3.large instances). Is that reading correct?
So I want to pass a pattern to a pull using :in $ pattern
and the pattern has a list of attributes like [:input/name :input/value]
except only the first attribute is coming back. If i hardcode the pattern with pull ?e [:input/name :input/value]
everything works as expected. I just upgraded to version 0.9.5703 after reading @marshall's comments in this thread: https://clojurians-log.clojureverse.org/datomic/2018-03-15
ultimately my goal is to pull using an om-next ast sent from the client. not sure if there are workarounds here but i'm surprised that passing the pattern as an argument works differently than hardcoding the pattern.
@austinbirch yes. But if you use reserved instances that price goes down by a noticable amount.