This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-02-12
Channels
- # aleph (22)
- # aws (7)
- # babashka (17)
- # beginners (69)
- # chlorine-clover (9)
- # cider (2)
- # clj-kondo (3)
- # cljdoc (30)
- # clojure (113)
- # clojure-dev (30)
- # clojure-europe (11)
- # clojure-italy (2)
- # clojure-nl (16)
- # clojure-spec (1)
- # clojure-sweden (3)
- # clojure-uk (17)
- # clojurescript (77)
- # cryogen (12)
- # data-science (5)
- # datomic (27)
- # duct (2)
- # emacs (37)
- # fulcro (24)
- # graphql (2)
- # kaocha (1)
- # lambdaisland (27)
- # leiningen (4)
- # off-topic (15)
- # onyx (1)
- # other-lisps (3)
- # re-frame (94)
- # reagent (2)
- # reitit (20)
- # ring (1)
- # shadow-cljs (66)
- # spacemacs (5)
- # sql (59)
- # tools-deps (140)
- # vim (1)
- # xtdb (17)
Oh you are also a mathematician!!!
So cool
I find it strange that engineering and software could not be considered for PhD. I mean maybe there is innovation but you are too critical to see it.
They can; In fact, a number of PhDs have been granted based for work on the underlying Vega/Vega-Lite libraries.
Sure, but, in addition to an enormous amount of work, there is a fair amount of real innovation in both of those. 20 or so years ago it was a serious amount of work to write a full compiler, but not much (even any) innovation. Yet, I know for a fact that a fair amount of people got their CS PhD writing a compiler for yet another 'new' language. Most of that was pretty egregious IMO. YMMV 😉