cljdoc 2022-04-19

@lee let's just merge this. I think it's ready to go and we can extend/clean up later

I've been through so many iterations on this, I'm a little burned out on it

I mean, if you feel confident in it. I'm feeling pretty good about it

Yeah, push that merge button!!! πŸš€

mashes the button

πŸ˜† 1
πŸŽ‰ 2

frantically refreshes the page

Looks nice! Maybe we should add a lil’ something to #announcements?

absolutely

what should we include in it?

I need to go pick up my daughter from school

I can whip something up. I’ll probably just mention that we have been working on library and docset search.

excellent!

thanks for everything with this, @lee πŸ’œ

Ditto, it’s been good fun!

congrats on the release! it looks great

small issue: i opened clojure.core and it seems the build failed (https://cljdoc.org/builds/56024)

Yeah I guess we should work to fix that one @nbtheduke! 😬 https://cljdoc.org/versions/org.clojure/clojure? Anyway thanks, I’ll raise a git issue.

πŸ‘ 1

it's weird to have search shipped and not know if it's even being used Β―\(ツ)/Β―

I've already used it multiple times, which led me to the above!

oh, nice! πŸ˜„

so glad to hear

I’m not sure if there are any stats gathered on cljdoc usage @corasaurus-hex I think @riccardovalentini1854 might have been looking at logs at some point? (or maybe I’m remembering wrong, dunno).

Sorry for the late reply. FWIW I went over a couple of days' worth of access logs once and remember that our average request rate was close to 1 req/s. If you need some other figures, I could try to pull them from that data sample ...

the trouble is searching is all client-side so we can't really know Β―\(ツ)/Β―

Oh right. simple_smile

it's fine, I just wish I could get that dopamine hit of seeing numbers go up

you know? πŸ˜