This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-02-12
Channels
- # adventofcode (6)
- # beginners (148)
- # boot (5)
- # calva (1)
- # cider (10)
- # cljdoc (10)
- # cljs-dev (8)
- # cljsrn (10)
- # clojure (180)
- # clojure-dev (24)
- # clojure-europe (2)
- # clojure-finland (1)
- # clojure-italy (32)
- # clojure-losangeles (1)
- # clojure-nl (40)
- # clojure-spec (10)
- # clojure-uk (44)
- # clojured (4)
- # clojurescript (88)
- # community-development (33)
- # core-async (7)
- # cursive (19)
- # datomic (98)
- # duct (3)
- # events (1)
- # figwheel-main (10)
- # fulcro (62)
- # leiningen (23)
- # luminus (18)
- # off-topic (19)
- # pedestal (6)
- # re-frame (46)
- # reagent (21)
- # ring (17)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # shadow-cljs (94)
- # slack-help (9)
- # spacemacs (14)
- # sql (1)
- # testing (4)
- # tools-deps (14)
Was there a way to link to the latest version of the docs? (gonna add links to exceptions...)
Yes, or just donโt specify a version number
99 PRs merged, who will be the author of PR#100? ๐
Hi and welcome @anthony-galea! Let me know if you have any questions ๐
thanks @martinklepsch regarding https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/issues/274 thanks for your fix https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/commit/b730f987f92fe46c12eac06871b2ac5d78e77689 ๐ but Iโm guessing my reply that your fix worked hid this comment: https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/issues/274#issuecomment-462720815 looking for advice on whether the exclusion is something you would recommend doing
@anthony-galea Indeed missed your earlier comments, the approach you took looks good ๐
Cool thanks @martinklepsch
No problem, thanks for taking a look! Will be nice to have quil on cljdoc :)