Clojurians Log v2

what bad things can happen? what does Alex say?

the arglist and docstring contract is 0+ xforms, 1 coll

the impl works if you provide no collection, but it's "undefined behavior"

in the future, the contract might be made explicit and throw if called without a collection

how common is this error now?

usage of (eduction) seems to be very limited (2-5 instance on github)

my proposal would be an entry in the args.clj file that has like eduction {:1 {:1 seq :ret any} {:varargs ...}}

(i don't remember the specific format, my apologies)

this still doesn't report anything I think, since clj-kondo will also see the varargs signature in the source code

ah, bummer

the thing you're mentioning is just for the type system

but if the source code changes, then clj-kondo will start reporting too

okay

Perhaps those weird (eduction) cases on github are because people just needed something of type Eduction

that's very possible

(cc @alexmiller we're discussing that eduction ticket)

so a backward compatible way of handling this would be (eduction '()) as the result of (eduction) perhaps

right, alex actually opened an issue about this in one of the cases: https://github.com/uncomplicate/fluokitten/issues/29

I opened ones for fluokitten and malli. the other ones from Ambrose all seem like tests

cool, then never mind. seems folks are using it correctly and we can probably ignore unintended zero-arg arity

fluokitten's issue already closed and fixed :)

i've updated the jira ticket with a patch removing the 0-arg arity, so this will be a non-issue when rich reviews and merges my code later this evening 😉

ha