clj-commons 2023-11-17

Since overtone/at-at is widely used but hasn't been updated in a while and there are some open PRs and issues I created a fork and released an updated version earlier this year. Someone - cant find their response - suggested it be a good idea to add at-at to clj-commons. We would obviously need agreement from the original author. How would we best go about this to get it arranged? https://github.com/LouDnl/at-at

I believe that @plexus might be tinkering with overtone stuff?

At least I seem to remember that lambda island released a new version of overtone not so long ago?

A bunch of folks are reviving Overtone, see the #overtone channel and mailing list. I have repo and clojars access. I haven't looked into the state of at-at yet. @thierry572 it would be helpful if you can comment on PRs saying you've reviewed them and adding any remarks or concerns, then I can be pretty quick in merging what seems reasonable to merge, and I can push a new release.

@plexus I released a new version in january which has all PRs that are open including some new features and a utility namespace.

So you reviewed the PRs? Or did you just blindly merge everything?

Not blindly no, because when I tried that things broke ;)

Not surprising, that's why some comments to help me triage would be helpful. Updating the CHANGELOG will also be a bit of work. If I can get help with these things we can get an official release out very quickly. If not it'll take a bit longer.

Ah nice, that's already great!

non required namespace with utilities

I mainly revived at-at earlier this year because I needed a unique identifier to be able to ignore duplicate jobs

Also have a dev branch on deps.edn

and some actions for building releases

borkdude added a pull to fix reflections for babashka

maybe we should move to #overtone, ill repost there

👍 1