Heya @slipset! Are any clj-commons project using http://codecov.io yet? I use it for rewrite-cljc-playground and am interested in using it for clj-commons/rewrite-clj. There is no fee for open source projects.
I’m not sure what kind of privs I’d need you to set to allow me to enable codecov for clj-commons/rewrite-clj. I am going push a button to request you grant me access to clj-commons from for codecov from GitHub. If that looks like not a good idea, lemme know.
I by no means want to pester you, but when you get a chance, would like to figure out if setting up codecov for a clj-commons project is a reasonable thing (I can’t do it without privs).
Hey, no stress, you’re not at all pestering.
I found it annoying tbh
at least the way it was set up with carve for a while: each PR was followed by a code coverage report on github, which felt a bit spammy
Yeah @borkdude, I think I remember it failing builds if coverage thresholds changed or were not met, I configured it to stop doing that. Since I’ve been working solo on rewrite-cljc, I don’t know about PR spam. I’ll look into it.
Yeah they can be disabled https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments via config.