Heya @slipset! Are any clj-commons project using http://codecov.io yet? I use it for rewrite-cljc-playground and am interested in using it for clj-commons/rewrite-clj. There is no fee for open source projects.
Don’t think it’s being used. Feel free.
I’m not sure what kind of privs I’d need you to set to allow me to enable codecov for clj-commons/rewrite-clj. I am going push a button to request you grant me access to clj-commons from for codecov from GitHub. If that looks like not a good idea, lemme know.
I by no means want to pester you, but when you get a chance, would like to figure out if setting up codecov for a clj-commons project is a reasonable thing (I can’t do it without privs).
Hey, no stress, you’re not at all pestering.
I found it annoying tbh
at least the way it was set up with carve for a while: each PR was followed by a code coverage report on github, which felt a bit spammy
Yeah @borkdude, I think I remember it failing builds if coverage thresholds changed or were not met, I configured it to stop doing that. Since I’ve been working solo on rewrite-cljc, I don’t know about PR spam. I’ll look into it.
Yeah they can be disabled https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments via config.