Clojurians Log v2
ai-skeptics 2026-07-06
Sort of, but not following up on @christian767's post on tagging announcements with AI or what not. It seems like it's not needed, because the AI projects seem to have announcements which go on forever. So perhaps not the best channel, but could we encourage announcements to be a bit on the short side and rather have a link to a thing which explains more in depth?
Yeah, I'd ask in #community-development so more people could chime in, since the ask isn't about AI per se.
one difficulty: on my laptop, the logic/magic post is a bit shorter vertically than borkdude’s post about SCI on clojuredart because of the included screenshot.
See my comment in another thread about announcement length: https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C0B7Q4XRM1U/p1782566803088229?thread_ts=1782477019.051979&cid=C0B7Q4XRM1U
I do like how we're basically getting crowdsourced disclosure by tagging posts with 🤖 (or possibly 🤖 🔫 )
I don't like that at all. :D I just don't mind that enough to mention anything. And 🤖 🔫 is straight up inappropriate.
to me it's not that different than tagging a US-only job post with 🇺🇸 , gives people a quick way to see that this is not for them
I don't think they're equivalent. 🇺🇸 is just factual metadata about the job (location), while 🤖 makes a statement about how the post was created. One describes an attribute of the opportunity; the other labels the content itself, which carries a value judgment and is much easier to read as dismissive.
Apart from that, 🇺🇸 is a statement of a fact, and 🤖 is not - LLMs are not verifiable.
And we live in now.
I see @p-himik as an admin is defending something that ought to be obvious here. If we start using guns in this community then count me out. Not sure if it was in jest, but that is a red line imo.