This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
@stijn: I keep meeting people who don't like protocols, but for reasons like your example, I think they're a good feature.
I've just replied at length to his email - I agree with him - as you know yada's design has been moving, but I think for good reasons - it's hard to document a moving target
phonebook only depends on modular's co-dependency. Perhaps it would be better to remove that
you're right, i'll remove it, or at least factor our a version that doesn't use it
actually, co-dependency uses the same atom deref idea - it's a general solution for dealing with circular dependencies in component systems
I mean, it's fine to have other examples, but phonebook should be a little easier
@stijn: btw. thanks for your malformed? issue, I'm now in full agreement, I just needed some time to sit down and think about it!