Clojurians Log v2

yep, I neglected to include that in the docs, sorry folks 😳 fixed now

thanks both 🙏 I didn't manage to repro this locally - what I tried: • docker run on the repro repo didn't have a version specified, so will implicitly be running against latest - I tried it against both latest (beta8) and beta6 explicitly ◦ beta8 did return all the rows - this is because of the breaking XTQL change in beta8 (updated code to follow) ◦ beta6 returned 0 rows as expected • migrating the code to beta8 also returned 0 rows @brandon149 could you check your Docker log for the Starting XTDB 2.x @ 2.0.0-beta8 @ 9323479 ... line?

> because of the breaking XTQL change in beta8 Ah, I missed that the Clojure API for querying was also affected by this parameter / fn change!

The docs need updating to reflect this, yes?

It looks okay to me. Does it work if you put the string value directly into the query like this:

(xt/q node '(from :users [{:person/email "user@email.com"}]))

That works as expected, yes

What version of XTDB are you using?

2.0.0-beta6

Hmm, I don't see anything in beta 7 or 8 that would invalidate that so... I don't know what I'm missing there...

It’s especially strange to me cause it’s working on the tutorial data.

Ah, so are you getting back docs that have :person/email that doesn't match the args email value? Or docs that don't have :person/email at all?

If you can put together a GitHub repo that is self-contained with instructions on how to repro, that would help...

I get all docs back. There is no filtering applied. I’ll put one up once I’m back in front of a computer.

This repo should do it https://github.com/bolivier/xtdb-reproduction

The xtql tutorial uses an in-memory db, and that works as expected, but when I replaced it with my running docker instance of xtdb, I see the same bad behavior.