Hey @U028ART884X - sorry for the delay, I was offline yesterday(!) XT is pretty good about keeping in-memory working sets to a minimum, thanks to the query planner + lazy execution, so I think you would find it working quite well in this scenario. That said, more RAM definitely helps keep everything as snappy as possible, particularly in regards RocksDB's block caching.

@U0C8489U6 I assume you mean this one? https://github.com/xtdb/xtdb/issues/1724

Yeah, that one, just wondering if it made it to that beta cause I don't see the tag in the repo

beta3 will go out tomorrow and it will be included in that.

oh great thanks for confirming that!

Oh, hm. It is strange that there's no beta2 tag in the repo. I'll check with @@jarohen about that, but beta3 is what you want, regardless. 🙂