Fork me on GitHub
#xtdb
<
2021-07-15
>
Steven Deobald02:07:19

I managed an off-by-one error with my timezones. @seancorfield did the Learn Crux Datalog meetup end in under 50 minutes?

seancorfield02:07:03

It's on right now. Been going just over an hour.

seancorfield02:07:26

Are you in the waiting room?

Steven Deobald02:07:19

Got in. Thank you!

Tomas Brejla11:07:56

Will there be a recording available of that mentioned _Learn Crux Datalog_ meetup?

refset12:07:12

I'm not sure, although I'm curious too(!) This was the event page https://www.meetup.com/Los-Angeles-Clojure-Users-Group/events/279378615/

Tomas Brejla12:07:46

@U899JBRPF and they mention in that event description you posted: The meeting will be recorded.

Tomas Brejla12:07:02

so fingers crossed 🤞 🙂

🤞 2
refset12:07:29

Oh yeah, it pays to read :)

truestory 2
Steven Deobald13:07:06

It was recorded. You can probably ping @U0510902N in #clojure-losangeles to see when it will be published. 🙂

nate19:07:52

Working on the recording now, hope to have it posted today or tomorrow

Tomas Brejla19:07:29

awesome, thanks for the information

seancorfield19:07:37

It was a fun session! Many thanks to @U01AVNG2XNF for dropping in to answer Qs!

🙏 2
richiardiandrea22:07:47

Question - with regards to (unit) testing, how one would go about test a query (aside from transacting all the required data before-hand)? I saw I cannot just pass a normal {} to crux/q EDIT: never mind - I realized that there is only the above way by checking crux's tests

✔️ 2
dominicm07:07:16

iirc there's a speculative transaction function in crux

dominicm07:07:54

https://github.com/vvvvalvalval/datomock maybe you could do something like this, but for crux?

refset09:07:03

^ this is true also, although beware that with-tx can't be chained currently https://github.com/juxt/crux/issues/1434