Fork me on GitHub
#vim
<
2018-05-18
>
dave00:05:59

i'm enjoying finally being able to use clj-refactor.nvim again. a lot of the things in the README work and are pretty powerful is it just me, or a lot of the features broken, though?

dave00:05:57

some of them cause cryptic, low-level errors, others don't seem to do anything, and others do the thing they're supposed to do, but in the wrong place

dave00:05:08

(not complaining, just curious if there are really lots of bugs, or if there is some problem with my setup!)

mynomoto00:05:41

@dave I have been using it and after getting past an issue with node 6 I had no trouble with commands marked as working on readme.

dave00:05:22

hmm, i think some of this might just be user error on my part

dave00:05:53

overall, though, i'm very happy with clj-refactor so far!

dominicm05:05:59

@dave which ones? Let's get them fixed!

fatihict07:05:35

@devth I also use Neovim with tmux for a while without performance issues (arch linux).

👍 4
fatihict07:05:48

All commands I tried in clj-refactor do work for me, but I do find that some commands like the unwindall or thread-first do not respect my formatting and position my cursor at the top of the current buffer

dave10:05:10

^that's the behavior I was seeing. "Cycle if" was doing that for me sometimes

dave10:05:55

I'll do another test of all the commands soon and see if I can find any more specifics

dominicm10:05:23

I might have broken the cursor stuff without realizing. The cursor is setup as a special argument which I had to implement again.

dave13:05:44

@dominicm i'm just going to start posting issues for any weirdness i encounter, if that's OK?

dave14:05:08

doing it!