untangled 2016-12-08

clojurescript is a pretty easy sell; I dare say it would be irrational not to use at least that

om-next makes java/javascript look like stone knives and bearskins

and rails look like silly string and LSD

😂 1

Also if you add a lot of docstrings it will increase your js size a lot

@siliconmagi has joined the channel

@mitchelkuijpers really? even in :advanced compilation?

@adambros yes pretty sure it wil keep the strings

http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-1853 but if it is right, then fns do get their docstrings stripped

Yeah fns do but not maps with :doc "", sorry I think you know this already

😅

oh that, i thought we were just talking in general

but yeah, i think tony and i have worked a solution that i’ll be trying here soon

still uses a docstring on a fn, so we’d be ok