Fork me on GitHub
#untangled
<
2016-10-21
>
currentoor00:10:07

@tony.kay I'm looking through untangled-components right now and this is really nice! Thanks for sharing.

currentoor00:10:37

But I was wondering any plans/desires to make these components cljc compatible so they can be rendered on the server?

currentoor00:10:42

Having super fast initial load times would be really nice.

grant05:10:36

Has anyone else tried to update to ClojureScript "1.9.293" on a untangled-template project? I get clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: failed compiling file:resources/public/js/compiled/dev/untangled/client/data_fetch.cljs.

anmonteiro07:10:04

@grant: Om Next needs to be bumped to alpha47 to work with 1.9.293

anmonteiro07:10:36

I'd first check if that works

ianchow11:10:25

wrt untangled-websocket, how do I get a tree of data that is pushed to the client to be automatically normalized? It doesn’t go through the usual untangled load-data that accepts a query. In the cookbook example, the pushed data is manually inserted into app state via functions. Do I have to dig into om.next’s merge and db<->tree?

grant15:10:34

@anmonteiro Thanks. As long as I know it should work I'll keep messing with it. I have tried explicitly requiring [org.omcljs/om "1.0.0-alpha47"] to override untangled's default there. I also tried bumping several other libraries. If you have it working without issue with ClojureScript 1.9.293, then it's something in my setup somewhere, will just have to find it.

tony.kay15:10:06

@currentoor Yes, but low priority

tony.kay15:10:20

@ianchow look at merge-state! in core. It allows you to supply a query for normalization, and was made just for that purpose. Has nice ident integration stuff too

wilkerlucio16:10:39

hello, I'm trying to update here as well and I can't compile with Untangled anymore, using cljs 1.9.293, om alpha-47 and untangled-client 0.5.7

tony.kay20:10:42

oh, latest cljs not working?

tony.kay20:10:53

what’s new in it?

wilkerlucio21:10:22

@tony.kay I'm not sure the issue yet, I just got back on my computer now, I did some discussion with @anmonteiro at #om channel about it, maybe something related to transit, not sure yet

tony.kay21:10:55

I see. So probably an Om thing, not Untangled

ethangracer21:10:42

@wilkerlucio I’m running om-47 and untangled client 0.5.7 and not having any problems, but we’re on cljs 1.8

wilkerlucio21:10:14

the problem seems related to the new version of ClojureScript, the 1.9.293

wilkerlucio21:10:36

reverting to 1.9.229 works fine