This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-03-29
Channels
- # beginners (14)
- # boot (83)
- # cider (13)
- # cljsrn (4)
- # clojure (240)
- # clojure-argentina (1)
- # clojure-berlin (2)
- # clojure-canada (1)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (1)
- # clojure-greece (2)
- # clojure-india (2)
- # clojure-japan (2)
- # clojure-russia (23)
- # clojure-taiwan (2)
- # clojure-uk (12)
- # clojurescript (138)
- # cursive (6)
- # datomic (36)
- # hoplon (245)
- # jobs-discuss (35)
- # lein-figwheel (4)
- # melbourne (2)
- # off-topic (1)
- # om (26)
- # om-next (2)
- # onyx (23)
- # proton (8)
- # quil (1)
- # re-frame (9)
- # ring-swagger (2)
- # untangled (10)
- # yada (6)
In the tutorial, besides issues of consistency and grammar; can I suggest that where the first person is used, it is in plural form. E.g. So, in some examples we'll be using the cljs->js function instead to make sure the docs and source stay in sync. For a tutorial, the latter is more important than the former
instead of So, in some examples I'm using the cljs->js function instead to make sure the docs and source stay in sync. I feel the latter is more important than the former
. It's a matter of style really, though I feel plural form is more appropriate for a tutorial.
@donavan: feel free to comb through and submit a PR. we’re mostly working on getting some kind of documentation out at all, not as much on the grammatical stuff yet. we’d appreciate the help though!
@donavan: I've been taking the Om tutorial and morphing it, so I do expect consistency problems. We need a more central theme in the whole thing that builds more. Glad to hear ideas there as well.
@ethangracer: I'm more than happy to work on editing and am doing it in a fork. I was just asking as a matter of style, something that is not wrong or right, that I don't feel comfortably making the call unilaterally just yet.
style-wise: choose one and make it consistent if you want, I'll follow from there as long as I know what it is