Fork me on GitHub
#unrepl
<
2018-02-27
>
dominicm07:02:39

@kotarak masochist, 😁

kotarak07:02:09

Ah. My work laptop is Windows with no python installed. And company IT won't allow it. So python means for me "no completion". It's a matter of customer orientation.

cgrand07:02:14

You mean: the completion plugin of choice requires python?

cgrand07:02:56

You have a JVM, an unrepl to it, a sideloader, let’s send Jython:-)

dominicm07:02:59

@kotarak that explains a lot 😛

kotarak08:02:40

AFAIU the implementations fork off a python thread for communication. That could also be used w/o python, I hope. Have to investigate.

dominicm08:02:40

There's a mountain of hacks beneath it all. It would be cool to see a pure vimscript implementation of this. NCM offered a vimscript API, but not a implementation

kotarak08:02:27

Asyncomplete.vim..... the plot thickens.

cgrand08:02:42

thickens? It looks more like a good news, no?

cgrand08:02:57

> This repository is fork of https://github.com/roxma/nvim-complete-manager in pure vim script with python dependency removed.

dominicm09:02:21

Oh neat, asyncomplete added neovim support, seems to have matured a lot since I last saw it. I need to add support for it I guess!

dominicm09:02:24

Interestingly, it supports preview, which NCM does not. And that's been bothering me quite a bit.

kotarak09:02:14

@cgrand oh. I always thought of "the plot thickens" as "becomes more interesting".

cgrand09:02:56

@kotarak to me “more complex, its resolution becomes less clear”

kotarak09:02:08

Oh. Ok. The pitfalls of non-native speaker's assumptions.

kotarak09:02:49

Maybe "things pick up speed"?

tianshu17:02:29

does unrepl support clojurescript?

pesterhazy17:02:24

@doglooksgood not at this point. There are some experiments but nothing easy to use yet AFAIK

cgrand17:02:25

@doglooksgood it depends which cljs. For self-host all that is lacking is someone willing to help.

richiardiandrea18:02:01

I reviewed this PR and it looks good to me, however I don't feel I can just merge it myself without Antonio checking it

cgrand19:02:18

While having this PR merged would be the cat’s pajamas that’s not what I was alluding too.

cgrand19:02:34

I was referring to porting to cljs. And using an accept to emulate the PR.

richiardiandrea02:02:29

Gotcha, thanks for replying 👍

cgrand19:02:18

While having this PR merged would be the cat’s pajamas that’s not what I was alluding too.

cgrand19:02:34

I was referring to porting to cljs. And using an accept to emulate the PR.

dominicm19:02:34

@cgrand I'm curious, why do all your message reply to thread & send to channel? Do you do it manually? Or use an alternative client?

cgrand20:02:00

@dominicm I like to spam :-) when I think that the reply is of interest outside the thread I check the box.

dominicm20:02:01

@cgrand you're clearly more patient than me. I find the slack UI difficult, because I have to move from the keyboard to the tickbox using a mouse (like, a physical one). I tend to rush replies and forget to tick boxes and such.

cgrand20:02:24

The thing is that the tick box is right above the keyboard on mobile.

dominicm21:02:17

Yeah, I'm better on mobile. I still tend to forget. This is probably betraying my hasty mentality.

dominicm22:02:03

That is difficult to word in english I think.