This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-05-17
Channels
- # aws (16)
- # beginners (82)
- # boot (29)
- # cider (43)
- # cljs-dev (90)
- # cljsrn (14)
- # clojure (79)
- # clojure-dev (12)
- # clojure-greece (4)
- # clojure-italy (12)
- # clojure-russia (81)
- # clojure-shanghai (1)
- # clojure-spec (39)
- # clojure-uk (28)
- # clojurescript (159)
- # consulting (1)
- # cursive (16)
- # data-science (6)
- # datomic (18)
- # devops (3)
- # emacs (22)
- # figwheel (1)
- # graphql (15)
- # hoplon (3)
- # jobs (1)
- # jobs-discuss (8)
- # leiningen (1)
- # luminus (6)
- # lumo (1)
- # off-topic (18)
- # om (6)
- # onyx (38)
- # pedestal (30)
- # perun (3)
- # re-frame (38)
- # reagent (8)
- # ring-swagger (2)
- # rum (2)
- # sql (2)
- # unrepl (14)
- # untangled (1)
- # vim (8)
@cgrand @pesterhazy I had problems concatenating files to send over REPLs with servers running old Clojure versions. I can’t remember if 1.5.0 or 1.6.0 fixed a bug where you couldn’t have multiple ns
forms in a single file.
@cfleming, I would argue 1.8.0+ because of Socket Server
I was happy to find that concatenating the two files just worked for unravel
but eventually it might be easier/more manageable to put things into a single namespace
something to consider at least
Yeah I understand it was a Clojure bug. My point is just that when you have just a plain repl (socket or not) you don't trigger this bug.
@cfleming with a plain repl there’s no load-file
involved (you can’t assume a shared FS), you just feed it form by form (well char by char even).