This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-11-25
Channels
- # adventofcode (1)
- # announcements (1)
- # beginners (244)
- # calva (20)
- # cider (11)
- # cljs-dev (34)
- # clojure (50)
- # clojure-spec (1)
- # clojure-uk (3)
- # clojurebridge (1)
- # clojurescript (21)
- # code-reviews (1)
- # cursive (19)
- # events (1)
- # expound (1)
- # fulcro (65)
- # hyperfiddle (6)
- # luminus (3)
- # nrepl (3)
- # off-topic (23)
- # protorepl (4)
- # re-frame (18)
- # rum (11)
- # shadow-cljs (77)
- # spacemacs (8)
- # tools-deps (2)
- # unrepl (1)
- # vim (2)
I have an interesting conundrum in pack. I'm trying to suppress this output:
SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
SLF4J: Found binding in [jar:file:/home/dominic/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-nop/1.6.2/slf4j-nop-1.6.2.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: Found binding in [jar:file:/home/dominic/.m2/repository/ch/qos/logback/logback-classic/1.2.3/logback-classic-1.2.3.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
SLF4J: See for an explanation.
SLF4J: Actual binding is of type [org.slf4j.helpers.NOPLoggerFactory]
Suppressing it for my projects is easy enough, I add exclusions to pack for slf4j-nop.
However, on projects which don't already have their own logging stack, it then results in:
SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
SLF4J: See for further details.
Which isn't a better result imo.
The ideal is that the -main
function's in pack would tell slf4j what to use if there's multiple bindings, suppressing the warning. But I don't see an obvious API for that. Anyone else got any good ideas?