Interesting 🙂 I like the idea of name tests over concepts, that makes good sense. Regarding the first question, in RSpec you get the structure of describing the tests for free:

describe "when there is one variant" do
 it "creates one variant" do
   expect { ... }
 end
end

Of course this is not the most important aspect in the world, but I would like to introduce a standard to our project so that the tests don’t look so messy

@robin.saaf I kinda sorta took that approach for https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/blob/a33d1eea3bb7cd832f92e84f985f22197a037c54/test/cljdoc/util/fixref_test.clj#L17-L158. Everything has its pros and cons... I like this for this particular test because it helped me to think about variants, and the test output is very descriptive. A downside is that it is a bit harder to extract an individual test in the REPL, especially when the testing blocks depend on some setup in the deftest. I guess also: run order of testing blocks is not randomized.