@seancorfield are you using RCF? If so would you like to chat about your experience? We're doing a sprint on the next version of it right now. --- https://github.com/hyperfiddle/rcf/ Interested in anyone's experience report - please talk to us if you're using RCF, community is currently in #hyperfiddle
@dustingetz No, I stopped trying to use it because of the named test issue I reported. I work extensively in the REPL and was relying on my fork of RCF with the changes I described in that issue -- but I stopped when y'all didn't seem very interested in my suggestions about named and unnamed test generation behaviors.
ty for the feedback!
I still think RCF is interesting but that issue is a complete showstopper for my workflow.