It doesn't cost anything, it's a static website

All the transpiling is happening on client browser?

yes

👍

maybe solidjs?

not sure

By atom you assume a state and a handler to change it like setState ?

yeah you could of course just use react directly

here is a small example using solidjs: https://github.com/squint-cljs/squint/blob/main/examples/solidjs/src/App.cljs but react is pretty similar

solidjs is a smaller bundle

Thanks for feedback! Summarizing: Use React or Solidjs for reactive state. Maybe just use promises for getting and setting local state in responsible way (async concerns). I didn’t realize vanilla js had atomic transactions (this is what I thought I needed atoms for for basic in-memory CRUD between functions) https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Atomics

Yes. Solid will give you a smaller bundle size I think but react is the popular option

What exactly do you mean? squint (output) already works on those targets?

Ditch closure compiler

My understanding is that all the code is CLJS -> SCI (closure) -> javascript

I guess your question is ambiguous. "make squint work", you probably mean "build squint"?

Yes. I am bullish on squint.

More on "make squint work" right now.

UI for squint - please elaborate.

Better Advent of Code UI.

Or: Better UI for solving Advent of Code puzzles with squint.

Advents are personal?

The puzzle input is personalized

@U0ETXRFEW @U04V15CAJ we can find a discussion place.

@URCRY0U87 not sure what find a discussion place means. But I think that if you try to solve an AOC puzzle with the template/tool linked here you will understand what the update is about.

@U0ETXRFEW apologies. As a non-native english, tried to express my intents.