Fork me on GitHub
#sql
<
2016-11-07
>
curtis.summers15:11:20

@leo.ribeiro Also, check out HugSQL, which is inspired by Yesql, but has several features supporting more dynamic queries: http://www.hugsql.org

leo.ribeiro16:11:56

@curtis.summers @mikeb thank you guys for the help!

leo.ribeiro16:11:35

although it was a little bit tricky to solve arrays used on IN operation...

leo.ribeiro16:11:16

@curtis.summers to be honest I started using hugsql… I can’t remember why we changed to yesql...

curtis.summers16:11:28

@leo.ribeiro well, if you do remember why you went that way I'd like to know from the standpoint of making HugSQL better. Thanks!

leo.ribeiro16:11:39

I just made a confusion… my own clojure projects uses hugsql (with luminous)

leo.ribeiro16:11:17

this project I started on CodeForMiami and they sent me the yesql and told me that has more stars… it was some bullshit like that

leo.ribeiro16:11:07

and I could not argue because I did not saw the above comparison

leo.ribeiro16:11:18

now I know for sure which is gonna fit better for us 😛

curtis.summers16:11:06

I think the more stars difference is primarily about how old each library is. HugSQL is a little over a year old. Yesql is closer to 3 years old. I've seen a big uptick in usage since the inclusion of HugSQL in the Luminous framework back in February.

curtis.summers16:11:39

luminous->luminus (I mispell that all the time.)

curtis.summers16:11:07

Anyhow, happy coding!

mikeb19:11:16

Is yesql effectively abandoned? Github issues are disabled and has very little activity recently.