Fork me on GitHub
#specter
<
2018-05-30
>
johanatan19:05:42

has anyone tried 1.1.1 w/ deps.edn and lumo ?

johanatan19:05:01

I am getting:

Could not require com.rpl.specter.navs in file com/rpl/specter.cljc
	 (new)
	 Function.cljs.core.ex_info.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$3 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:2024:72)
	 Function.cljs.analyzer.error.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$3 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:2639:92)
	 Function.cljs.js.require.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$5 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5954:145)
	 Function.cljs.js.load_deps.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$7 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5965:119)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5965:570)
	 Function.cljs.js.require.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$5 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5943:1)
	 Function.cljs.js.load_deps.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$7 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5965:119)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5965:570)
	 Function.cljs.js.require.cljs$core$IFn$_invoke$arity$5 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5943:1)

Maximum call stack size exceeded
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6625:177)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6120:138)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6010:425)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6024:218)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5968:270)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5947:36)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6120:138)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6010:425)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:6024:218)
	 (NO_SOURCE_FILE <embedded>:5968:270)
when I do so.

nathanmarz20:05:07

@johanatan don't see how that would have anything to do with specter, #tools-deps is probably a better place to ask

johanatan20:05:40

well specter is the only dep that this method is failing for

johanatan20:05:47

have you tried it?

johanatan20:05:03

apparently the lib needs to be cljs self-host compatible (not sure if specter is)

nathanmarz20:05:23

ah, well that would explain it

johanatan20:05:44

do you have any plan to fix it? should I create an issue to track it?

nathanmarz21:05:37

that is the issue to track it

nathanmarz21:05:49

no plans to fix it since I don't use clojurescript

nathanmarz21:05:04

a pull request for it would be welcome though

johanatan22:05:32

oh, sorry. i thought that was on the planck project (didn't look at the url)