@nathanmarz Thanks for the help. It's very useful!

Hi there. Lately, I pretty much enjoy writing specter one-liners, neat!

I have a probably numb question but is it possible in (transform PATH f val) to make the transformation somewhat depend on the application of val. I give an example (on which I stumbled multiple times)... Consider a map like this: `

{ :a 2 :b 1 :c 3}

(sorry for the very bad slack edits, I'm new here ;-)... So I would like to obtain : { :a 1 :c 3} and :b is no more ... Thanks in advance (and sorry again for the awfully bad typing above).

(plus I see that it's the middle of the night in the U.S. and no one's here ;-). See you later then !

(oops) To rephrase myself: is it possible in (transform PATH f val) to make the transformation somewhat depend on the application of f ?

@fredokun there's discussion of a feature for that here: https://github.com/nathanmarz/specter/issues/117

you could always make that navigator yourself

keypath, MAP-VALS, and ALL could have that functionality

thanks for the reply I will look at the issue and try to do something !

I wish specs were … Specter-aware, if that makes sense.

Haven't completely thought this through.

But it would be nice to be able to use Specter selectors in specs rather than traditional keypaths.