This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-06-05
Channels
- # beginners (135)
- # cider (30)
- # clara (66)
- # cljs-dev (18)
- # cljsrn (6)
- # clojure (115)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-dev (10)
- # clojure-italy (7)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-spec (18)
- # clojure-uk (26)
- # clojurescript (76)
- # cursive (2)
- # datomic (4)
- # devops (1)
- # emacs (19)
- # fulcro (159)
- # garden (3)
- # klipse (5)
- # leiningen (5)
- # off-topic (61)
- # om (7)
- # pedestal (6)
- # re-frame (17)
- # reagent (73)
- # ring-swagger (6)
- # rum (5)
- # shadow-cljs (60)
- # spacemacs (31)
- # specter (4)
- # vim (8)
- # yada (1)
@jeff.terrell ok I did a few more tests and I managed to narrow it down quite a bit. it’s happening whenever there’s a blank indentation in front of it. so for example, if my cursor is here
|
and if I do qq i fo ESC q @q
it will read fofoo
but if there are no blank spaces in front of it, so if my cursor is here
|
then it works finewith a default .spacemacs as well?
@bravilogy - Nice triage. Yep, I can reproduce. Looks like a legit (and fascinating!) bug. O SPC ESC qq i fo ESC q @q
yields a line with ffooo
. Nice find!
Looks like this might not even be related to evil-mode
: O SPC ESC <F3> i fo ESC <F4> <F4>
does the same thing.
In fact, you can reproduce this entirely within insert mode. O <F3> fo <F4> <F4>
yields fofoo
.
Oh OK I thought <F3>
/`<F4>` was stock emacs, but I don't know. C-x (
does feel more emacs-y.
Have you tried vanilla emacs?
This is really pretty interesting. Kudos.
I haven’t tried vanilla emacs because I don’t know anything in emacs haha 😄 I’m a hardcore vim user
Yeah, I'm not surprised about that. In general I've found vim's macros to be more reliable and robust than those in emacs.
Do you want to ask people in #emacs?