This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-11-22
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (1)
- # adventofcode (21)
- # announcements (2)
- # beginners (44)
- # calva (1)
- # cider (2)
- # cljdoc (16)
- # cljs-dev (70)
- # cljsrn (29)
- # clojure (66)
- # clojure-austria (1)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojure-finland (1)
- # clojure-hamburg (1)
- # clojure-italy (24)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-uk (127)
- # clojurescript (30)
- # core-typed (3)
- # cursive (34)
- # data-science (2)
- # datomic (16)
- # duct (17)
- # editors (1)
- # emacs (4)
- # figwheel-main (4)
- # fulcro (40)
- # hoplon (2)
- # instaparse (5)
- # kaocha (4)
- # leiningen (1)
- # luminus (4)
- # nrepl (46)
- # off-topic (5)
- # onyx (2)
- # other-languages (55)
- # parinfer (3)
- # protorepl (4)
- # re-frame (33)
- # reagent (6)
- # reitit (13)
- # ring-swagger (5)
- # shadow-cljs (26)
- # spacemacs (4)
- # sql (8)
- # testing (27)
- # tools-deps (21)
- # yada (1)
hi. shadow-cljs
has been reporting this on my build:
------ WARNING #1 --------------------------------------------------------------
File: bidi/bidi.cljc:29:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26 | actually a valid UUID (this is handled by the route matching logic)."
27 | [s]
28 | #?(:clj (java.util.UUID/fromString s)
29 | :cljs (cljs.core.UUID. s)))
------------------^-------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong number of args (1) passed to cljs.core.UUID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30 |
31 | ;; When forming paths, parameters are encoded into the URI according to
32 | ;; the parameter value type.
33 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a warning, so nothing serious as I can keep working with no problem. Just wondering: should I report it to bidi
?nevermind, there is already an issue on this: https://github.com/juxt/bidi/issues/189
Hi thheller, FYI I've got asset fingerprinting working in a configure
build hook similar to how we outlined it last week. Deploying today. If it all works then I'll run the implementation past you.
👍 4
I think there's still quite a bit of work required before it's ready for a PR into shadow-cljs.