Just for fun:
The Skittles S is copyrighted, so this couldn't be an official logo, but I think it's fun. 🙂
@borkdude Am I wrong in thinking that you gave a talk on Scittle somewhere at some point?
I remember the DCD talk where you had a https://youtu.be/oCd74TQ-gf4?si=FZhEF2lnL4DKrG70&t=1085.
That's probably the only talk where I mentioned scittle in any detail
https://youtu.be/DHtRfO3Bp90?si=IepS12W2IzdEqjYV&t=1009 from the Strange Loop talk on Babashka.
I'm just leaving some breadcrumbs for myself here. 😉
If you're willing, I'll try to share a section of my slides with you before my talk so you can catch any lies I might inadvertently (or advertently) tell. 😜
And the https://youtu.be/pgNp4Lk3gf0?si=4TjAz8KgzQv_mp9-&t=493 from London Clojurians.
For the sake of completeness, the https://vimeo.com/754492531, though of course anything @raymcdermott says is highly suspect at best.
I guess Mia, Mike, and Eric almost offset him, though, so maybe it's OK.
ah I forgot about that one :)
I see I collected some links here as well: https://github.com/babashka/scittle/issues/40
Wow, Scittle is incredibly simple! Just read the code in about 5 minutes. 😅
I mean this as high praise, ofc.
true, it's basically just SCI + reading stuff from script tags and executing those 🤷
So Shadow CLJS builds SCI + the thin sugary Scittle shell, right?
true
This is fucking brilliant, dude!
heheh
No advanced compilation as far as I can tell, right?
yes, it is advanced compiled
Oh, it is. OK. I guess Shadow CLJS does that by default? I didn't see any obvious directives in the https://github.com/babashka/scittle/blob/main/shadow-cljs.edn.
Yes, when you run release it means advanced