scittle 2024-03-02

Just for fun:

😆 2
🔴 1

The Skittles S is copyrighted, so this couldn't be an official logo, but I think it's fun. 🙂

@borkdude Am I wrong in thinking that you gave a talk on Scittle somewhere at some point?

That's probably the only talk where I mentioned scittle in any detail

I'm just leaving some breadcrumbs for myself here. 😉

If you're willing, I'll try to share a section of my slides with you before my talk so you can catch any lies I might inadvertently (or advertently) tell. 😜

For the sake of completeness, the https://vimeo.com/754492531, though of course anything @raymcdermott says is highly suspect at best.

I guess Mia, Mike, and Eric almost offset him, though, so maybe it's OK.

1

ah I forgot about that one :)

I see I collected some links here as well: https://github.com/babashka/scittle/issues/40

1

Wow, Scittle is incredibly simple! Just read the code in about 5 minutes. 😅

I mean this as high praise, ofc.

true, it's basically just SCI + reading stuff from script tags and executing those 🤷

😮 1

So Shadow CLJS builds SCI + the thin sugary Scittle shell, right?

This is fucking brilliant, dude!

💯 1

No advanced compilation as far as I can tell, right?

yes, it is advanced compiled

Oh, it is. OK. I guess Shadow CLJS does that by default? I didn't see any obvious directives in the https://github.com/babashka/scittle/blob/main/shadow-cljs.edn.

Yes, when you run release it means advanced

1