This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-04-03
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # babashka (31)
- # bangalore-clj (3)
- # beginners (18)
- # bitcoin (2)
- # calva (14)
- # clj-kondo (37)
- # clojure (43)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojurescript (24)
- # data-science (4)
- # datahike (1)
- # datascript (3)
- # datomic (1)
- # fulcro (16)
- # lsp (13)
- # malli (1)
- # meander (7)
- # off-topic (1)
- # polylith (12)
- # re-frame (7)
- # reitit (1)
- # rewrite-clj (46)
- # rum (4)
- # shadow-cljs (15)
- # specter (3)
- # sql (55)
- # tools-deps (20)
while looking through the source, I saw special handling for :<>
and :*
for the tag in the markup, basically expanding into a fragment
. Is that legacy behavior and you should be using fragment
instead or why is that not documented?
prefer :<> over other methods
would you want me to add a PR to add this to the docs? It's not yet documented, if I've looked correctly
Anecdotally I've come across a couple instances where a rum/fragment
works but the equivalent shorthand [:<>]
does not (created some runtime exception). I was in a bit of a rush so didn't figure out a minimal reproducible example. I'll try to do so next time I come across it
In the meantime, are you aware of any situations where [:<>]
is problematic?