Unfortunately I haven’t had much time for Clojure open source development so far this year.

hi, I hope all is good.

I don't know about who is involved in the project but. Is there Someone else to take it on when you are not available?

No-one has volunteered.

hmm, large shoes to fit maybe (I hope I got the saying good). do they know they can step in ?

It’s an open source project, and I get pull requests, so I assume so.

yeah ....

I’m hoping to have more time later in the year. It’s been a combination of real-world renovations and burnout that has kept me from doing more than merging and reviewing PRs.

yeah, take care of yourself.

Thanks 🙂 - you too.

maybe it will help to let people know that they take a shot at this

as people, we sometimes lean on others to do the work, esp. if they are doing a great job

A shot at what? Development of 2.0?

and you seem to have a great track reckord 🙂

yeah, 2.0

I would like to contribute jetty adapter for jetty-10 and 11 if possible

Realistically, 2.0 development would require collaboration with me anyway. It would be a lot of discussions in order to nail down the final design.

There’s already a project for a Ring adapter for Jetty 10. And if you want to make one for Jetty 11, that’s fine by me, too.

I kind of had that impression - the spec is really well designed IMO - seems like a lot of thought went into it

hmmm, I missed the jetty-10 adapter

Confusingly, it’s called the Jetty 9 adapter.

🙂 ok. I think I found it https://github.com/sunng87/ring-jetty9-adapter .

thanks, take care and hope we see you back when you decide it's time 🙂

I would gladly help move 2 fwd (I am sure I am not the only one willing). In any case it's mostly about defining a new spec, supporting it on adapters is secondary and relatively easy (I did it for jetty 11+ on a personal project). Working on a final spec for something as important as ring should probably be done by a group of people and pass a very high bar of confidence before it's considered final.

Adding on the last point, do you think there's place to create an official ring work group?

It would make sense

I'm interested in this as well, willing to help out as I can

Cc @U055NJ5CC

> … and burnout that has kept me from doing more than merging and reviewing PRs. sorry to hear that, take care. renovations 👍

not sure how much time I would have on work group, but definitely curious. I’m really happy with current non-namespaced ring (1) model, so not eagerly waiting for 2.0. But as it seems everyone else is excited and we have a lot of os-libs on top of ring, I’m all ears and happy to contribute if possible.