This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-09-08
Channels
- # announcements (40)
- # babashka (14)
- # babashka-sci-dev (7)
- # beginners (50)
- # calva (8)
- # cider (25)
- # clj-kondo (7)
- # cljdoc (8)
- # cljs-dev (14)
- # clojars (6)
- # clojure (56)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-berlin (2)
- # clojure-dev (16)
- # clojure-europe (18)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-norway (5)
- # clojure-uk (7)
- # clojurescript (100)
- # cursive (57)
- # data-science (9)
- # datomic (6)
- # emacs (11)
- # figwheel (2)
- # fulcro (14)
- # helix (2)
- # hyperfiddle (9)
- # introduce-yourself (1)
- # lsp (20)
- # malli (14)
- # meander (34)
- # minecraft (1)
- # missionary (8)
- # off-topic (37)
- # pedestal (4)
- # polylith (18)
- # portal (3)
- # re-frame (5)
- # ring (33)
- # shadow-cljs (32)
- # spacemacs (6)
- # vim (16)
hi, any ideas how far away is ring2 ? is there a way to get ring-2 releases out for testing - as snapshots or alpha ?
not sure, it seems somewhat stalled: https://github.com/ring-clojure/ring/issues/393
Unfortunately I haven’t had much time for Clojure open source development so far this year.
I don't know about who is involved in the project but. Is there Someone else to take it on when you are not available?
No-one has volunteered.
hmm, large shoes to fit maybe (I hope I got the saying good). do they know they can step in ?
It’s an open source project, and I get pull requests, so I assume so.
I’m hoping to have more time later in the year. It’s been a combination of real-world renovations and burnout that has kept me from doing more than merging and reviewing PRs.
Thanks 🙂 - you too.
as people, we sometimes lean on others to do the work, esp. if they are doing a great job
A shot at what? Development of 2.0?
Realistically, 2.0 development would require collaboration with me anyway. It would be a lot of discussions in order to nail down the final design.
There’s already a project for a Ring adapter for Jetty 10. And if you want to make one for Jetty 11, that’s fine by me, too.
I kind of had that impression - the spec is really well designed IMO - seems like a lot of thought went into it
Confusingly, it’s called the Jetty 9 adapter.
🙂 ok. I think I found it https://github.com/sunng87/ring-jetty9-adapter .
I would gladly help move 2 fwd (I am sure I am not the only one willing). In any case it's mostly about defining a new spec, supporting it on adapters is secondary and relatively easy (I did it for jetty 11+ on a personal project). Working on a final spec for something as important as ring should probably be done by a group of people and pass a very high bar of confidence before it's considered final.
Adding on the last point, do you think there's place to create an official ring work group?
> … and burnout that has kept me from doing more than merging and reviewing PRs. sorry to hear that, take care. renovations 👍
not sure how much time I would have on work group, but definitely curious. I’m really happy with current non-namespaced ring (1) model, so not eagerly waiting for 2.0. But as it seems everyone else is excited and we have a lot of os-libs on top of ring, I’m all ears and happy to contribute if possible.