Fork me on GitHub
#ring-swagger
<
2017-03-01
>
bostonaholic14:03:22

Since I see 188 users in here, what are peoples' thoughts on ring-swagger?

mpenet15:03:43

It just works. But it also desperately needs a proper clj.spec integration, as people are moving from Schema -> Spec. So dev is a bit in limbo I think

ikitommi15:03:00

sadly, spec seems to be in limbo too, have been waiting fixes for months to finalize things.

ikitommi15:03:27

maybe the full spec integration should be split into atomic'ish issues and have a joint dev day (or two) to finish and test everything?

ikitommi15:03:08

also, the json schema -> spec would be massive usefull (ping @mpenet), generate project skeletons from swagger definitions.

mpenet15:03:23

yes, I all for things moving forwards. But true, things are slow upstream

mpenet15:03:40

I am not convinced about schema -> spec converters anymore tho

ikitommi15:03:59

from json-schema? why is that?

mpenet15:03:35

I missread

mpenet15:03:52

i thought you means utilities to convert prismatic/Schema -> spec