This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-02-19
Channels
- # announcements (13)
- # asami (43)
- # babashka (35)
- # beginners (175)
- # calva (23)
- # cider (5)
- # clj-kondo (68)
- # cljsrn (4)
- # clojure (61)
- # clojure-australia (7)
- # clojure-europe (20)
- # clojure-gamedev (59)
- # clojure-israel (11)
- # clojure-italy (4)
- # clojure-nl (2)
- # clojure-norway (21)
- # clojure-spec (12)
- # clojure-uk (43)
- # clojurescript (9)
- # cursive (56)
- # data-oriented-programming (5)
- # datascript (1)
- # events (1)
- # fulcro (16)
- # honeysql (46)
- # leiningen (1)
- # malli (4)
- # off-topic (12)
- # pathom (46)
- # re-frame (24)
- # reagent (14)
- # reitit (1)
- # reveal (8)
- # rewrite-clj (16)
- # ring (13)
- # sci (9)
- # spacemacs (14)
- # specter (2)
- # sql (2)
- # tools-deps (1)
- # vim (2)
Due to circumstances beyond my control, I was at 0 borks on the borkdude productivity meter for the last week, but am back at the keyboard and back to working toward rewrite-clj v1.
@UE21H2HHD as I lost a lot of time trying to use cljs.analyzer then realizing that it does not fit my needs, I might implement further versions of my tool based on rewrite-clj + custom analyzer. Let me know if you need any tester for the v1.
I also wasted a TON (is an all-caps ton heavier?) of time implementing potemkin import-vars in cljs which I’m going to abandon (which meant lots of time with cljs.analyzer). But… I also learned a TON, so, in the end I’m cool with the adventure.
That was also a good experience for myself as well, i learned how to improve Minimallist in the process.
I usually operate at steady 0.1 borks, but this last week, it was a flat 0 borks weeks.
I’m looking at my old TODOs in rewrite-clj and uncovered a few items around the regex node. One of them has me waffling. Calling sexpr
on a regex node currently returns (list 're-pattern string-pattern)
. I’m wondering if it should return an actual regex, as in (re-pattern string-pattern)
.
Or maybe this might be more troubling than helpful for the rewrite-clj user due to diffs in regex for clj and cljs.