This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-04-19
Channels
- # announcements (24)
- # asami (25)
- # babashka (17)
- # beginners (99)
- # bitcoin (1)
- # calva (2)
- # cider (6)
- # cljs-dev (4)
- # clojure (88)
- # clojure-australia (3)
- # clojure-europe (23)
- # clojure-france (6)
- # clojure-nl (5)
- # clojure-uk (31)
- # clojured (1)
- # clojurescript (6)
- # clojureverse-ops (1)
- # datomic (28)
- # depstar (18)
- # emacs (11)
- # events (1)
- # fulcro (21)
- # graalvm (4)
- # graphql (7)
- # heroku (1)
- # jackdaw (18)
- # joker (3)
- # kaocha (1)
- # lsp (1)
- # malli (13)
- # meander (4)
- # off-topic (12)
- # pathom (14)
- # pedestal (2)
- # podcasts-discuss (1)
- # re-frame (37)
- # reagent (17)
- # reitit (9)
- # shadow-cljs (44)
- # xtdb (17)
Hi all, I was doing validation of my reitit route data and noticed that reitit has support only for spec
at https://github.com/metosin/reitit/blob/master/modules/reitit-core/src/reitit/spec.cljc, would be interesting to add support to malli schemas? If so, what approach? I thought about creating a malli.cljc
file and replicate the behavior of spec.cljc
@iagwanderson darn the slack history, someone just asked the same - there definitely should be support for malli. either a) replace the (buggy) spec validation with malli or b) allow one to pick either one. I would start with b, not sure how rude it would be to evolve eventually to a.
also, malli pretty printer would be needed, so much on the open source backlog, so little time (have a draft of that already)
@U055NJ5CC I checked the virhe repo and there is no code in there, this picture is from a local code you were experimenting with?