This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-01-18
Channels
- # aleph (1)
- # announcements (2)
- # aws (4)
- # beginners (73)
- # boot (2)
- # boot-dev (3)
- # cider (6)
- # cljs-dev (40)
- # clojure (64)
- # clojure-austin (2)
- # clojure-belgium (1)
- # clojure-dev (25)
- # clojure-estonia (1)
- # clojure-europe (16)
- # clojure-italy (11)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-spec (90)
- # clojure-sweden (2)
- # clojure-uk (105)
- # clojurescript (58)
- # core-async (10)
- # cursive (23)
- # data-science (1)
- # datascript (3)
- # datomic (14)
- # duct (11)
- # fulcro (48)
- # graphql (1)
- # hyperfiddle (3)
- # kaocha (95)
- # liberator (1)
- # lumo (6)
- # nrepl (1)
- # off-topic (14)
- # onyx (2)
- # overtone (8)
- # portkey (3)
- # re-frame (31)
- # reagent (6)
- # shadow-cljs (185)
- # sql (12)
- # tools-deps (6)
- # vim (6)
- # yada (224)
Using reagent et shadow-cljs, there is a behaviour I don’t understand. Is it a bug, or is it OK to use reagent/as-element for map results? This looks overly heavy for me.
reagent/as-element is intended for when you need to pass a component as hiccup formatted data as a child component. Please see the docs: https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/blob/master/doc/InteropWithReact.md
Thanks you for your replies 🙂
I’m calling it [component] in another form-1 reagent component