This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-06-04
Channels
- # aws (3)
- # beginners (63)
- # boot (10)
- # cljs-dev (14)
- # cljsrn (10)
- # clojars (4)
- # clojure (132)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-spec (3)
- # clojure-uk (1)
- # clojurescript (206)
- # css (3)
- # datascript (5)
- # lein-figwheel (1)
- # leiningen (1)
- # off-topic (48)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (29)
- # specter (4)
- # untangled (1)
- # yada (1)
Also, I'd recommend not using react-with-addons as it is deprecated and the next React version will drop it completely, instead the addons are now provided as separate packages: https://github.com/cljsjs/packages/tree/master/react-transition-group
it's a sugar for adapt-react-class which should be googlable
Thanks @noisesmith 🙂
man, this question comes up so often, it would be so useful to have better (additional, unofficial?) reagent docs
@pesterhazy I think a minimal solution would be to add links in the reagent README with each news article and then list out the key terms .. something like:
News 0.5.0
- adapt-react-class
- :>
- ...
but i wont discourage anyone who wants to take time to actually improve the docs! everyone benefits when that happens
The only problem with that is that people aren't actually interested in the chronological history of the project
Maybe better to sort the feature by topic?
E.g.
React intertop
- adapt-react-class
- :>
- as/element
State tracking
- ratoms
- track
- track!
- reactions
- cursors
I like it! if a good organization of topics emerges ... the cookbook could also spell out examples for each thing too to supplement
who's maintaining the readme these days?
for reagent itself, a number of us (@yogthos @mikethompson etc.) would be comfortable accepting PRs for the README to improve documentation I think. As for the cookbook, I maintain that (just haven't done much in a while)
if only keywords could have doc metadata, being able to run (doc :>) would have handy
(but that doesn't quite work because really anyone can use that keyword for anything...)
I think reorganizing the docs would be pretty useful and doable
Even just a better TOC would be great
I’ve been using the re-frame/reagent combo for quite some time and I had no idea that track
was a thing. Just looked it up. Thanks! I’ll have to read the changelist to get up-to-date 😛
track is super handy 🙂
I still don’t se what it provides over re-frame subscriptions that are subscribed to other subscriptions. From what I understand, you get the same thing out of both. Am I wrong?
track is like a subscription, yup
but doesn't require re-frame
it's essentially a nice way to create a reaction
Alright, I've created a "wishlist" issue with a list of topics: https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/issues/302