This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2015-12-04
Channels
- # admin-announcements (6)
- # alda (1)
- # announcements (3)
- # aws (4)
- # beginners (233)
- # boot (82)
- # cider (11)
- # cljsjs (21)
- # cljsrn (7)
- # clojure (262)
- # clojure-japan (1)
- # clojure-russia (129)
- # clojure-sg (2)
- # clojure-taiwan (2)
- # clojurecup (23)
- # clojurescript (162)
- # clojurex (3)
- # core-async (18)
- # cursive (81)
- # datavis (183)
- # datomic (23)
- # emacs (2)
- # funcool (25)
- # ldnclj (82)
- # lein-figwheel (3)
- # om (196)
- # onyx (74)
- # parinfer (7)
- # portland-or (12)
- # re-frame (60)
- # reagent (48)
- # slack-help (1)
- # yada (9)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/3ve6sv/help_keep_the_name_reagent_from_being_hijacked_by/
https://twitter.com/intelligibabble/status/672559078678245376 Lots of supporters for our Reagent, a well established community already. Send em some nice tweets so they can rename đź‘Ť:skin-tone-4:
"Is there a corresponding issue filed on the ClojureScript project to mention this project in the readme?” Does anyone else feel like this comment is just incredibly salty?
rofl what
I checked the twitter responses
Holy cow, he's mad salty
also "It's not ideal... but it's clojurescript and not JS so i think it could be worse. :/"
If I could use LINE stickers right now...
Well, let’s see how they react to the issue. There’s 52 comments now. I really hope they change the name
You would think that airbnb would want to have a good reputation in the developer community.
I really don't know what's stopping them from just changing the name
Too bad they were 2 years late :
The last two gitnub comments by airbnb are ridiculous. Can't even understand. "While we appreciate everyone offering input, and will consider it, please do not offer simple "+1s", as these add no value. I will be deleting all +1s that offer nothing to the conversation, and if more continue to be added, I will be forced to lock the conversation." "@gadfly361Â i don't find them easy to skip past when I'm trying to read the whole thread to understand people's thoughts. +@csummers: Issues (of any kind) are not decided based on "popularity" or "number of people affected" - 1 person is just as important as 1 million. The only impact "+1" has is irritating contributors; it doesn't increase the perceived importance of the issue."
Making progress: https://github.com/airbnb/reagent/issues/46
I don’t even know how you make that mistake. even googling “reagent js” takes you to the reagent cljs page
> It turns out that ”Cloact” was a really, really bad name. It made some people think about birds’ behinds, in possibly unhealthy ways, which even Google suggested they should.
I mean, you can use props, the arguments passed to render function are equivalent to React props
To be constructive, I'd encourage you good-namers out there to help AirBnB: https://github.com/airbnb/reagent/issues/46